There are many components to this approach:
Firstly, we’re talking about the future, and from what I can gather, no-one can say with any real accuracy what’s going to happen. And the times and events we are approaching are apparently unprecedented in the history of the universe.
Secondly, there are some significant variables to take into account, such as what the Earth is doing and what the remaining dark side will do in response to the growth of the Light.
Thirdly, the population of the Earth is presently around 6 billion. Almost all are living as if nothing out of the ordinary is happening. How will the predicted changes affect them? How can they be supported and encouraged through the changes? And will people get their reward, or their comeuppance? What do they deserve?
I have been reading a considerable amount of material about these things. As time has gone on, I have distilled the various writings into a fairly comprehensive but nevertheless not entirely certain perspective about what is supposedly happening and what actual events may happen from this time on.
I have also been keen to understand how things will work out in the context of people’s everyday lives. Hardly any writers seem to concern themselves with this, but I do. And when it comes to whether the ordinary, average people will get their reward or their comeuppance, I strongly feel they should get their reward because they are victims, not the villains, of the piece.
Okay, enough prattling….let’s take the different factors one by one:
Most sources say that Earth has to undergo far-reaching physical changes. Some sources say that ETs and the Spiritual Hierarchy will help to minimise the impact of changes on humanity, but most are agreed that humanity is not doing enough to mitigate these impacts by dissipating the negative energies that have been stored up in the Earth over millennia. Actually it’s difficult to imagine how we could do this, other than by dying or being profoundly affected by what we call natural disasters.
Some earthly commentators have predicted earthquakes and volcanic eruptions and climatic phenomena that have failed to materialise, as if these dire predictions are turning out to be exaggerated.
Sheldan Nidle’s ET friends are talking about evacuating Earth’s population either to the inner Earth or to other planets whilst the Earth makes sweeping changes to its surface area. Not exactly terra-forming, as they propose for Mars and Venus, but something so significant that humanity could not survive the process. I think this may happen after the ascension has taken place. More on that later.
It seems possible that there will be a number of sizeable earth movements from this time onwards. These would particularly affect the ‘Ring of Fire’ stretching from the southern Pacific Ocean up the west coast of the Americas, westward through Alaska across the top of the Pacific and then southwards through Japan and Indonesia, and then eastwards and southwards to New Zealand. Not only earthquakes but volcanic eruptions could occur along the Ring of Fire and already there are almost constant events taking place though not of a very great magnitude at the time of writing. There are many other areas that could be affected unexpectedly, as was the Indian Ocean in 2004 and it is said that earth changes will affect everyone to some extent.
These changes could entail large loss of life. As I’ve said above, this could be karmic settlement, or it could be people taking an opportunity to check out of this lifetime as a personal choice in preference to seeing through the ascension process. Whatever, we are encouraged to understand that so-called death is not the end but merely a staging post on our route through eternity. For those who are left, we are best to think of these things in the most positive light possible, and in that way we will be nearest to the truth of the matter.
These changes could also affect the international economy and, of more immediate concern, the food and fuel distribution networks. The globalisation of the economy has left us vulnerable to a breakdown of infrastructure leading to food and fuel shortages which in turn could lead to very unpleasant situations. For this reason I would urge societies and communities to revert to a more self-sufficient and self-reliant way of life. Unfortunately there’s not much hope that they would listen. I’ve already tried in my own area.
We have become too complacent about the security of our food and fuel supplies. It would take very little to disrupt our lives catastrophically. We learnt nothing in the U.K. from the fuel protests in 2000, when but for a settlement of the strike we were about to run out of petrol and diesel. We caught a glimpse of the disaster that such a thing would cause, but we merely resumed our usual complacency and imagined that no such thing would occur in actuality.
Fuel shortages could occur if not through wage demands from tanker drivers then through earthquakes damaging oil pipelines or storage facilities or refineries or off-shore drilling installations. The price of crude oil has been increasing lately because of rising demand from China and India particularly, and disruption to supplies from the Gulf of Mexico following hurricanes there. Any more disruption could push the price to levels where the price of food becomes too high for some of us, and eventually for all of us. Rationing of fuel could occur, with the private motorist being hit hardest. Would we cope?
Food supplies could be disrupted by earthquakes and major volcanic eruptions as farm workers, harvests, farming land, communication routes and national economies are affected. Here in the U.K., despite having some of the best farming land and climate for farming in the world we have little access to home-grown food. We have virtually no sense of self-reliance. We simply assume that someone is organising our food supplies for us. This is true at the present time but we cannot blithely rely on our suppliers always being able to supply. If not, then what? Food riots? Stealing and looting? Worse?
We can no longer deny that the global climate is changing, though there is still controversy over the main cause. My understanding is that the Earth is warming herself up as she transforms herself into a semi-tropical paradise, perhaps slightly cooler at the poles, as she rises in consciousness. This information comes from various sources, extra-terrestrial and spiritual, who are anticipating the changes that Mother Earth will undergo.
It is also compelling to imagine that we ourselves are contributing to global warming through the greenhouse effect caused by our burning of fossil fuels. We must surely be having some impact.
There is, however, it seems, very little we can meaningfully do about global warming. The process appears to be out of our control, both because we cannot stop the Earth from ascending and because we do not have the political will to change our way of life as drastically as would be required. So one way or another, our profligate way of life is soon to be at an end.
Then, and before then, climate change will have a major impact on food-growing. We know already that there is insufficient food being grown in the world, and millions already die from starvation world-wide. Here in the prosperous west we have remained insulated from the threat of starvation but only, if we but knew it, at the expense of those in the developing world whose land and labour we use to feed ourselves. For this we can give thanks to the aforementioned western bankers who have used their power and guile and wile to subjugate the developing world into slavery. We in the west have been the beneficiaries of this global deception. How much longer are we going to turn a blind eye?
To rectify this situation we need to grow our own food. We need to grow as much as we can in our own homes, in our communities, in our towns and cities, in our regions and in our country. Where necessary we need to insist that our politicians and civil servants and farmers unions and environmentalists make these changes happen as soon as possible. This needs to be sooner than many such people would consider possible.
Just as an aside, I used to work for a 70-year old woman who completely transformed my conception of what is possible. She was the leader of the Transcendental Meditation organisation in Britain. She considered it quite to be expected that we should do the impossible twice before breakfast and a miracle before lunchtime. And she was right. It could be done. Now I’m expecting the same of those in power, and I don’t think they’ve been working under the same expectations before now. It’s very liberating to discover how dynamic you can be when you’re really pushed. My colleague at the Pensioners’ Convention where I have worked for the last two years recently frequently described me as ‘dynamite’ – that’s a compliment that the powers-that-would-be should aspire to.
Yes, we need to grow our own food. It may already be too late to make this change by baby-steps. Word has it that 2006 is going to be a tumultuous year, with the possibility of economic collapse in the U.S. and here in the U.K. We can’t wait for food self-sufficiency to be established in two years’ time. So in the meantime we need food stocks to be built up, and I suggest two years’ worth of food, including the basics of grains and tinned foods. Frozen foods are too vulnerable to power outages. Vegetables, salad foods and fruit can be grown at home. Sprouted grains are reputedly some of the most nutritious foods available, especially if you grow them at home, and these are easily grown in jars on a warm window sill in summer and in the airing cupboard in winter. Many grains and beans are suitable for sprouting.
As I said earlier, eating meat is not conducive to ascending, so if you’re intending to ascend, it’s to be increasingly a vegetarian diet from now on. Releasing farming land from livestock will contribute towards Britain’s self-sufficiency in grains and vegetables. Dairy foods and eggs are still good, and you will probably need some protein to help your body transform into a higher state. But large amounts of protein are unnecessary and actually harmful, so do not go overboard with milk, cheese and eggs. Grains, fruit and nuts are the ideal, most natural, most sustainable diet.
We cannot be complacent about food supplies any longer. There are too many credible threats to our food supplies. So I urge action at individual, community and town and city level immediately to safeguard food stocks and supplies.
In a community there could be a safe-house in which dry, dried, frozen and tinned food could be stored for future sale or distribution. When the store is full the house can be opened as a shop and the food be replenished as top-up. A community could have its own hydroponic farming units, for fresh vegetables and salad foods such as tomatoes and lettuce. People with gardens could make them available to food-growers from the community, and share the produce. We need to start thinking in a different way if we are to do the most important thing of all – survive.
Wars and terrorism:
There’s a lot of information on the internet suggesting that George Bush’s so-called ‘war on terror’ is a reverse-engineered war on Islam. That is, those behind the U.S government, mainly using the CIA to organise it, have set up the whole scenario including Osama bin Laden to foment Islamic fundamentalism against the mainly Christian west. This would be stoked sufficiently to provoke World War III, enabling the U.S. effectively to impose martial law first on the U.S. and then across the world – in other words, total domination of the whole civilised world.
This would include the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Towers as an inside job, together with other such outrages as the Oklahoma bombing.
Even the 7/7 London ‘suicide’ bombings have the same hallmarks of an inside job. In both the 9/11 and 7/7 instances, there were ‘exercises’ going on at precisely the same moment which had the effect of diverting the attention of the legitimate security authorities from what was actually happening. If you want to review some of this information, go to www.rense.com or www.prisonplanet.com. It’s difficult not to be convinced by all the evidence, and there is plenty of it.
There can be no doubt that the Islamic world has reason to resent both American and British imperialism over the centuries. It is surely not difficult to provoke the resentment of Muslims. Give them a credible figure like Osama bin Laden with the financial resources to train and motivate would-be terrorists and they’re on their way.
And this would be typical of Annunaki-inspired malevolence. Successive U.S. governments have been deeply mired in efforts to become the world’s only Superpower, certainly since the Second World War but even earlier there were signs. Again, one needs to read the alternative histories described on the internet and judge the evidence.
The threat of terrorism is an ideal tool to inspire fear throughout the world. According to channelled messages from spiritual sources, fear is the biggest threat to the Light, because it closes down our receptivity to the Light. It is inescapable that we are constantly fed fear through the media in all its forms. Terrorism is just one more tool, and an effective tool because as its name suggests it spreads extreme fear – terror.
If the ‘war on terror’ is indeed a U.S. tool to spread fear, the U.S. is not going to defeat terror but will keep it going for as long as possible. Most governments in the west are talking about new security measures to prevent terror, but please note that they also restrict personal freedoms. In the U.S., the Patriot Act and Homeland Security are creating a police state with martial law. It’s all very predictable. The powers behind the scenes intend to imprison us and prevent us from ascending. It’s the only way they can stay in control – or so they feel. Actually they’re being ambivalent about this, because they also know that their cause is lost – they cannot prevent ascension. All they can do is their damnedest to make sure they take as many souls with them when they go to hell – as they assuredly will – hell being the place where their evolution starts all over again from scratch and takes a very, very long time. But it could be worse and may well be – their souls could be dissolved back into the infinite and they would cease to be. No wonder they’re going for broke.
The Last Dark Cabal:
Judging by what I’m reading these days, by the time you read this George Bush and his cohorts should have been removed from power and be under house arrest or suchlike.
(December 10th 2006: Well, not yet, but Bush recently lost his power over both Senate and Congress and the wolves are circling. The Bush family has apparently purchased a 100,000 acre ranch in Paraguay – for exile?)
The ETs describe the present U.S. government as ‘the last dark cabal’. That is to say, now that the dark Annunaki have left the planet and joined the forces of Light, only the dark side’s human minions are left. This includes all those who are still bent on taking as much wealth and power as they can, those at the top of such pyramids as the banking industry, the religions, the pharmaceutical industry and other mega trans-national corporations.
Of all those, the executive power is most concentrated in the New World Order or the Project for the New American Century. As we can see, the Bush government seems hell-bent on asserting its diktat throughout the world. And, according to the ETs, they gotta go. Now.
The New World Order, which appears to have been superseded by the much darker Project for the New American Century, has been in the making for almost 100 years. It is significant that despite all such talk it has not yet materialised in its full, imagined potential. This would be, I feel, because the time was not right and collective consciousness did not support it. Nevertheless the bankers, as I described above, fashioned their own world order and achieved much of it. The dark side works behind the scenes, patiently, persistently, inexorably, whereas the light works in full view and only by consent. The concept of New World Order was the child of many good people of good intent, but it was always vulnerable to being usurped by the dark side, as it eventually was by those who are presently behind the Bush government in the U.S., with their Project for the New American Century.
Here is an historical run-down of the hopes and plans for a New World Order and the eventual takeover by the Project for the New American Century. I am indebted to an unknown researcher who compiled the following. I don’t think he or she will mind me copying it here:
A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
In the mainline media, those who adhere to the position that there is some kind of “conspiracy” pushing us towards a world government are virulently ridiculed. The standard attack maintains that the so-called “New World Order” is the product of turn-of-the-century, right-wing, bigoted, anti-semitic racists acting in the tradition of the long-debunked Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, now promulgated by some Militias and other right-wing hate groups.
The historical record does not support that position to any large degree but it has become the mantra of the socialist left and their cronies, the media.
The term “New World Order” has been used thousands of times in this century by proponents in high places of federalized world government. Some of those involved in this collaboration to achieve world order have been Jewish. The preponderance are not, so it most definitely is not a Jewish agenda.
For years, leaders in education, industry, the media, banking, etc., have promoted those with the same Weltanschauung (world view) as theirs. Of course, someone might say that just because individuals promote their friends doesn’t constitute a conspiracy. That’s true in the usual sense. However, it does represent an “open conspiracy,” as described by noted Fabian Socialist H.G. Wells in The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution (1928).
In 1913, prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, President Wilson’s ‘The New Freedom’ was published, in which he revealed:
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
On November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote a letter to Col. Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson’s close advisor:
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson… ”
That there is such a thing as a cabal of power brokers who control government behind the scenes has been detailed several times in this century by credible sources. Professor Carroll Quigley was Bill Clinton’s mentor at Georgetown University. President Clinton has publicly paid homage to the influence Professor Quigley had on his life. In Quigley’s magnum opus Tragedy and Hope (1966), he states:
“There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international … network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies… but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”
Even talk show host Rush Limbaugh, an outspoken critic of anyone claiming a push for global government, said on his February 7, 1995 program:
“You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked from an Ivy League school — Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government — you’ve shown an aptitude to be a good Ivy League type, and so you’re plucked so-to-speak, and you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain role in government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the handpickers can put you.”
On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb said on The Charlie Rose Show that:
“… you [Charlie Rose] had me on [before] to talk about the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It’s one world now. The Council [CFR] can find, nurture, and begin to put people in the kinds of jobs this country needs. And that’s going to be one of the major enterprises of the Council under me.”
Previous CFR chairman, John J. McCloy (1953-70), actually said they have been doing this since the 1940s (and before).
The thrust towards global government can be well-documented but at the end of the twentieth century it does not look like a traditional conspiracy in the usual sense of a secret cabal of evil men meeting clandestinely behind closed doors. Rather, it is a “networking” of like-minded individuals in high places to achieve a common goal, as described in Marilyn Ferguson’s 1980 insider classic, The Aquarian Conspiracy.
Perhaps the best way to relate this would be a brief history of the New World Order, not in our words but in the words of those who have been striving to make it real.
1912 — Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator in which he promotes “socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”
1913 — The Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a reserve) is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island, Georgia by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House. This transferred the power to create money from the American government to a private group of bankers. It is probably the largest generator of debt in the world.
May 30, 1919 — Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes. Two years later, Col. House reorganizes the Institute of International Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
December 15, 1922 — The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip Kerr, states:
“Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as [the earth] remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states until some kind of international system is created. The real problem today is that of the world government.”
1928 — The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by H.G. Wells is published. A former Fabian Socialist, Wells writes:
“The political world of the … Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments… The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York… The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed… It will be a world religion.”
1931 — Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught:
“One day we shall start to spread the most theatrical peace movement the world has ever seen. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent … will fall into the trap offered by the possibility of making new friends. Our day will come in 30 years or so… The bourgeoisie must be lulled into a false sense of security.”
1931 — In a speech to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen) historian Arnold Toynbee said:
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands….”
1932 — New books are published urging World Order:
Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S.
The New World Order by F.S. Marvin, describing the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World Order. Marvin says, “nationality must rank below the claims of mankind as a whole.”
Dare the School Build a New Social Order? is published. Educator author George Counts asserts that:
“… the teachers should deliberately reach for power and then make the most of their conquest” in order to “influence the social attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation… The growth of science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, trust in Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of social economy.”
1933 — The first Humanist Manifesto is published. Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a synthesizing of all religions and “a socialized and cooperative economic order.” Co-signer C.F. Potter said in 1930:
“Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?”
1933 — The Shape of Things to Come by H.G. Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around 1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an increasing lack of public safety in “criminally infected” areas. The plan for the “Modern World-State” would succeed on its third attempt (about 1980), and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq. The book also states,
“Although world government had been plainly coming for some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition prepared anywhere.”
1934 — The Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose works are channelled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase “points of light” in connection with a “New Group of World Servers” and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of “the organizing of the men and women… group work of a new order… [with] progress defined by service… the world of the Brotherhood… the Forces of Light… [and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the new world order must be built.”
The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N. summits. Later Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey’s writings on the subject.
1932 — Plan for Peace by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks” including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.
October 28, 1939 — In an address by John Foster Dulles, later U.S. Secretary of State, he proposes that America lead the transition to a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.
1939 — New World Order by H. G. Wells proposes a collectivist one-world state”´ or “new world order” comprised of “socialist democracies.” He advocates “universal conscription for service” and declares that “nationalist individualism… is the world’s disease.” He continues:
“The manifest necessity for some collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and biological life of mankind, are aspects of one and the same process.” He proposes that this be accomplished through “universal law” and propaganda (or education).”
1940 — The New World Order is published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and contains a select list of references on regional and world federation, together with some special plans for world order after the war.
December 12, 1940 — In The Congressional Record an article entitled A New World Order John G. Alexander calls for a world federation.
1942 — The leftist Institute of Pacific Relations publishes Post War Worlds by P.E. Corbett:
“World government is the ultimate aim… It must be recognized that the law of nations takes precedence over national law… The process will have to be assisted by the deletion of the nationalistic material employed in educational textbooks and its replacement by material explaining the benefits of wiser association.”
June 28, 1945 — President Truman endorses world government in a speech:
“It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.”
October 24, 1945 — The United Nations Charter becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho) introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on record as favouring the creation of a world republic including an international police force.
1946 — Alger Hiss is elected President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hiss holds this office until 1949. Early in 1950, he is convicted of perjury and sentenced to prison after a sensational trial and Congressional hearing in which Whittaker Chambers, a former senior editor of Time, testifies that Hiss was a member of his Communist Party cell.
1946 — The Teacher and World Government by former editor of the NEA Journal (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan is published. He says:
“In the struggle to establish an adequate world government, the teacher… can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and cooperation… At the very heart of all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession.”
1947 — The American Education Fellowship, formerly the Progressive Education Association, organized by John Dewey, calls for the:
“… establishment of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to world authority… ”
October, 1947 — NEA Associate Secretary William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should:
“… teach about the various proposals that have been made for the strengthening of the United Nations and the establishment of a world citizenship and world government.”
1948 — Walden II by behavioural psychologist B.F. Skinner proposes “a perfect society or new and more perfect order” in which children are reared by the State, rather than by their parents and are trained from birth to demonstrate only desirable behavior and characteristics. Skinner’s ideas would be widely implemented by educators in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s as Values Clarification and Outcome Based Education.
July, 1948 — Britain’s Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs, sees “a New World Order” taking shape:
“How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?… Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking shape… which may point the way toward the new order… That will be the beginning of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split personality, but held together by a common faith.”
1948 — UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states:
“Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
1948 — The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European federation.
The Constitution provides for a “World Council” along with a “Chamber of Guardians” to enforce world law. Also included is a “Preamble” calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this “Federal Republic of the World” to seize private property for federal use.
February 9, 1950 — The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 which begins:
“Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to provide a true world government constitution.”
The resolution was first introduced in the Senate on September 13, 1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho). Senator Alexander Wiley (R-Wisconsin) called it “a consummation devoutly to be wished for” and said, “I understand your proposition is either change the United Nations, or change or create, by a separate convention, a world order.” Senator Taylor later stated:
“We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support themselves.”
1950 — In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, international financier James P Warburg said:
“we shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”
April 12, 1952 — John Foster Dulles, later to become Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, that “treaty laws can override the Constitution.” He says treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights. A Senate amendment, proposed by GOP Senator John Bricker, would have provided that no treaty could supersede the Constitution, but it fails to pass by one vote.
1954 — Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands establishes the Bilderbergers, international politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis.
1954 — H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., President – Ford Foundation said to Norman Dodd of the Congressional Reese Commission:
“… all of us here at the policy-making level have had experience with directives… from the White House… . The substance of them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”
1954 — Senator William Jenner said:
“Today the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people… outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded and is sure that it is the winning side…. All the strange developments in the foreign policy agreements may be traced to this group who are going to make us over to suit their pleasure…. This political action group has its own local political support organizations, its own pressure groups, its own vested interests, its foothold within our government, and its own propaganda apparatus.”
1958 — World Peace through World Law is published, where authors Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn advocate using the U.N. as a governing body for the world, world disarmament, a world police force and legislature.
1959 — The Council on Foreign Relations calls for a New International Order Study Number 7, issued on November 25, advocated:
“… new international order [which] must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, for social and economic change… an international order… including states labelling themselves as ´socialist´ [communist].”
1959 — The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.
1959 — The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers´ Fund. It explains that the U.S.:
“… cannot escape, and indeed should welcome… the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions — spiritual, economic, political, social.”
September 9, 1960 — President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170, promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states:
“For it becomes clear that the first step toward World Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social.”
1961 — The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which “no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”
March 1, 1962 — Sen. Clark speaking on the floor of the Senate about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever. “… This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.”
1962 — New Calls for World Federalism. In a study titled, A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield states:
“… if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.”
The Future of Federalism by author Nelson Rockefeller is published. The one-time Governor of New York, claims that current events compellingly demand a “new world order,” as the old order is crumbling, and there is “a new and free order struggling to be born.” Rockefeller says there is:
“a fever of nationalism… [but] the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks….These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order… [with] voluntary service… and our dedicated faith in the brotherhood of all mankind…. Sooner perhaps than we may realize… there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.”
1963 — J. William Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee speaks at a symposium sponsored by the Fund for the Republic, a left-wing project of the Ford Foundation:
“The case for government by elites is irrefutable… government by the people is possible but highly improbable.”
1964 — Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states:
“… a large part of what we call ´good teaching´ is the teacher’s ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the students´ fixed beliefs.”
His Outcome-Based Education (OBE) method of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning in Chicago schools. After five years, Chicago students´ test scores had plummeted causing outrage among parents. OBE would leave a trail of wreckage wherever it would be tried and under whatever name it would be used. At the same time, it would become crucial to globalists for overhauling the education system to promote attitude changes among school students.
1964 — Visions of Order by Richard Weaver is published. He describes:
“progressive educators as a ´revolutionary cabal´ engaged in ´a systematic attempt to undermine society’s traditions and beliefs.´”
1967 — Richard Nixon calls for New World Order. In Asia after Vietnam, in the October issue of Foreign Affairs, Nixon writes of nations´ dispositions to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a “new world order.”
1968 — Joy Elmer Morgan, former editor of the NEA Journal publishes The American Citizens Handbook in which he says:
“the coming of the United Nations and the urgent necessity that it evolve into a more comprehensive form of world government places upon the citizens of the United States an increased obligation to make the most of their citizenship which now widens into active world citizenship.”
July 26, 1968 — Nelson Rockefeller pledges support of the New World Order. In an Associated Press report, Rockefeller pledges that, “as President, he would work toward international creation of a new world order.”
1970 — Education and the mass media promote world order. In Thinking About A New World Order for the Decade 1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr. asserts that:
“… the World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline — world order — into educational curricula throughout the world… and to concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts into the mass media again on a worldwide level.”
1972 — President Nixon visits China. In his toast to Chinese Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member and now President, Richard Nixon, expresses “the hope that each of us has to build a new world order.”
May 18, 1972 — In speaking of the coming of world government, Roy M. Ash, director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that:
“within two decades the institutional framework for a world economic community will be in place… [and] aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to a supernational authority.”
1973 — The Trilateral Commission is established. Banker David Rockefeller organizes this new private body and chooses Zbigniew Brzezinski, later National Security Advisor to President Carter, as the Commission’s first director and invites Jimmy Carter to become a founding member.
1973 — Humanist Manifesto II is published:
“The next century can be and should be the humanistic century… we stand at the dawn of a new age… a secular society on a planetary scale…. As non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature not deity… we deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds…. Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government…. The true revolution is occurring.”
April, 1974 — Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner’s article The Hard Road to World Order is published in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs where he states that:
“the ´house of world order´ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down… but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
1974 — The World Conference of Religion for Peace, held in Louvain, Belgium is held. Douglas Roche presents a report entitled We Can Achieve a New World Order.
The U.N. calls for wealth redistribution: In a report entitled New International Economic Order, the U.N. General Assembly outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor nations.
1975 — A study titled, A New World Order, is published by the Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Studies, Princeton University.
1975 — In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign A Declaration of Interdependence, written by historian Henry Steele Commager. The Declaration states that:
“we must join with others to bring forth a new world order… Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that obligation.”
Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:
“It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a ´new world order’ that would redistribute the wealth created by the American people.”
1975 — Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy and former CFR member, writes in a critique that the goal of the CFR is the “submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all powerful one-world government… ”
1975 — Kissinger on the Couch is published. Authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state:
“Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the U.S. government should espouse a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to confound, discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition… ”
1976 — RIO: Reshaping the International Order is published by the globalist Club of Rome, calling for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.
1977 — The Third Try at World Order is published. Author Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies calls for:
“changing Americans´ attitudes and institutions” for “complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)” and “for individual entitlement to food, health and education.”
1977 — Imperial Brain Trust by Laurence Shoup and William Minter is published. The book takes a critical look at the Council on Foreign Relations with chapters such as: Shaping a New World Order: The Council’s Blueprint for Global Hegemony, 1939-1944 and Toward the 1980´s: The Council’s Plans for a New World Order.
1977 — The Trilateral Connection appears in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly. Written by Jeremiah Novak, it says:
“For the third time in this century, a group of American schools, businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a New World Order… ”
1977 — Leading educator Mortimer Adler publishes Philosopher at Large in which he says:
“… if local civil government is necessary for local civil peace, then world civil government is necessary for world peace.”
1979 — Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican Senator from Arizona, publishes his autobiography With No Apologies. He writes:
“In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power — political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future.”
1984 — The Power to Lead is published. Author James McGregor Burns admits:
“The framers of the U.S. constitution have simply been too shrewd for us. They have outwitted us. They designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges, tinkering. If we are to ´turn the Founders upside down´ — we must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected.”
1985 — Norman Cousins, the honorary chairman of Planetary Citizens for the World We Chose, is quoted in Human Events:
“World government is coming, in fact, it is inevitable. No arguments for or against it can change that fact.”
Cousins was also president of the World Federalist Association, an affiliate of the World Association for World Federation (WAWF), headquartered in Amsterdam. WAWF is a leading force for world federal government and is accredited by the U.N. as a Non-Governmental Organization.
1987 — The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:
“… a pervasive system of thought control exists in the United States… the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education… people are told what to think about… the old order is crumbling… Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous social disease… A new vision is required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions… a new Constitution is necessary.”
1988 — Former Under-secretary of State and CFR member George Ball in a January 24 interview in the New York Times says:
“The Cold War should no longer be the kind of obsessive concern that it is. Neither side is going to attack the other deliberately… If we could internationalize by using the U.N. in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear, in most cases, a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the U.N. back to doing something useful… Sooner or later we are going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they are not confined merely to the nation-states. Start first on a regional and ultimately you could move to a world basis.”
December 7, 1988 — In an address to the U.N., Mikhail Gorbachev calls for mutual consensus:
“World progress is only possible through a search for universal human consensus as we move forward to a new world order.”
May 12, 1989 — President Bush invites the Soviets to join World Order. Speaking to the graduating class at Texas A&M University, Mr. Bush states that the United States is ready to welcome the Soviet Union “back into the world order.”
1989 — Carl Bernstein´s (Woodward and Bernstein of Watergate fame) book Loyalties: A Son’s Memoir is published. His father and mother had been members of the Communist party. Bernstein´s father tells his son about the book:
“You’re going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right… I’m worried about the kind of book you’re going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you’re saying he was right… I agree that the Party was a force in the country.”
1990 — The World Federalist Association faults the American press. Writing in their Summer/Fall newsletter, Deputy Director Eric Cox describes world events over the past year or two and declares:
“It’s sad but true that the slow-witted American press has not grasped the significance of most of these developments. But most federalists know what is happening… And they are not frightened by the old bug-a-boo of sovereignty.”
September 11, 1990 — President Bush calls the Gulf War an opportunity for the New World Order. In an address to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says:
“The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times… a new world order can emerge in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony…. Today the new world is struggling to be born.”
September 25, 1990 — In an address to the U.N., Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze describes Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait as “an act of terrorism [that] has been perpetrated against the emerging New World Order.” On December 31, Gorbachev declares that the New World Order would be ushered in by the Gulf Crisis.
October 1, 1990 — In a U.N. address, President Bush speaks of the:
“… collective strength of the world community expressed by the U.N. … an historic movement towards a new world order… a new partnership of nations… a time when humankind came into its own… to bring about a revolution of the spirit and the mind and begin a journey into a… new age.”
1991 — Author Linda MacRae-Campbell publishes How to Start a Revolution at Your School in the publication In Context. She promotes the use of “change agents” as “self-acknowledged revolutionaries” and “co-conspirators.”
1991 — President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union Message:
“What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea — a new world order… to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind… based on shared principles and the rule of law…. The illumination of a thousand points of light…. The winds of change are with us now.”
February 6, 1991 — President Bush tells the Economic Club of New York:
“My vision of a new world order foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function.”
June, 1991 — The Council on Foreign Relations co-sponsors an assembly Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order which is attended by 65 prestigious members of government, labor, academia, the media, military, and the professions from nine countries. Later, several of the conference participants joined some 100 other world leaders for another closed door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in Baden Baden, Germany. The Bilderbergers also exert considerable clout in determining the foreign policies of their respective governments. While at that meeting, David Rockefeller said in a speech:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
July, 1991 — The Southeastern World Affairs Institute discusses the New World Order. In a programme, topics include, Legal Structures for a New World Order and The United Nations: From its Conception to a New World Order. Participants include a former director of the U.N.´s General Legal Division, and a former Secretary General of International Planned Parenthood.
Late July, 1991 — On a Cable News Network programme, CFR member and former CIA director Stansfield Turner (Rhodes scholar), when asked about Iraq, responded:
“We have a much bigger objective. We’ve got to look at the long run here. This is an example — the situation between the United Nations and Iraq — where the United Nations is deliberately intruding into the sovereignty of a sovereign nation… Now this is a marvelous precedent (to be used in) all countries of the world… ”
October 29, 1991 — David Funderburk, former U. S. Ambassador to Romania, tells a North Carolina audience:
“George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging.” The vehicle to bring this about, said Funderburk, is the United Nations, “the majority of whose 166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American.”
Funderburk served as ambassador in Bucharest from 1981 to 1985, when he resigned in frustration over U.S. support of the oppressive regime of the late Rumanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu.
October 30, 1991: — President Gorbachev at the Middle East Peace Talks in Madrid states:
“We are beginning to see practical support. And this is a very significant sign of the movement towards a new era, a new age… We see both in our country and elsewhere… ghosts of the old thinking… When we rid ourselves of their presence, we will be better able to move toward a new world order… relying on the relevant mechanisms of the United Nations.”
Elsewhere, in Alexandria, Virginia, Elena Lenskaya, Counsellor to the Minister of Education of Russia, delivers the keynote address for a programme titled, Education for a New World Order.
1992 — The Twilight of Sovereignty by CFR member (and former Citicorp Chairman) Walter Wriston is published, in which he claims:
“A truly global economy will require … compromises of national sovereignty… There is no escaping the system.”
1992 — The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit takes place in Rio de Janeiro this year, headed by Conference Secretary-General Maurice Strong. The main products of this summit are the Biodiversity Treaty and Agenda 21, which the U.S. hesitates to sign because of opposition at home due to the threat to sovereignty and economics. The summit says the first world’s wealth must be transferred to the third world.
July 20, 1992 — Time magazine publishes The Birth of the Global Nation by Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar, roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR Director, and Trilateralist, in which he writes:
“All countries are basically social arrangements… No matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary… Perhaps national sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all… But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government.”
As an editor of Time, Talbott defended Clinton during his presidential campaign. He was appointed by President Clinton as the number two person at the State Department behind Secretary of State Warren Christopher, former Trilateralist and former CFR Vice-Chairman and Director. Talbott was confirmed by about two-thirds of the U.S. Senate despite his statement about the unimportance of national sovereignty.
September 29, 1992 — At a town hall meeting in Los Angeles, Trilateralist and former CFR president Winston Lord delivers a speech titled Changing Our Ways: America and the New World, in which he remarks:
“To a certain extent, we are going to have to yield some of our sovereignty, which will be controversial at home… [Under] the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)… some Americans are going to be hurt as low-wage jobs are taken away.”
Lord became an Assistant Secretary of State in the Clinton administration.
1992 — President Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N said:
“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.”
Winter, 1992-93 — The CFR’s Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts:
“It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands… Underlying the rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity… It is a sense that increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international law… In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be evident and accepted.”
1993 — Strobe Talbott receives the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award for his 1992 Time article, The Birth of the Global Nation and in appreciation for what he has done “for the cause of global governance.” President Clinton writes a letter of congratulation which states:
“Norman Cousins worked for world peace and world government…. Strobe Talbott’s lifetime achievements as a voice for global harmony have earned him this recognition… He will be a worthy recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Best wishes… for future success.”
Not only does President Clinton use the specific term, “world government,” but he also expressly wishes the WFA “future success” in pursuing world federal government. Talbott proudly accepts the award, but says the WFA should have given it to the other nominee, Mikhail Gorbachev.
July 18, 1993 — CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA:
“What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system… a first step toward a new world order.”
August 23, 1993 — Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University, says in a C-SPAN interview:
“… it is, of course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies internationally.”
October 30, 1993 — Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR’s media members:
“Their membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it.”
January/February, 1994 — The CFR’s Foreign Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael Clough in which he writes that the “Wise Men” (e.g. Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have:
“assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50 years… They ascended to power during World War II… This was as it should be. National security and the national interest, they argued must transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make up America… How was this small band of Atlantic-minded internationalists able to triumph … Eastern internationalists were able to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions… As long as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign policy making system.”
1994 — In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called “Global Governance For the 21st Century”. The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said:
“Mankind’s problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the United Nations system.”
1995 — The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who’s-whos from around the world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However, the term “global governance” is now used in place of “new world order” since the latter has become a political liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.
1996 — The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for “global governance,” calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000.
End of quote.
In 1997, twenty-five of the most prominent people, almost all men, wrote a Statement of Principles for the Project for the New American Century, clearly intending that America should be the prime controller of a world order. It is this group, whether the original twenty-five or now somewhat extended and changed from the original twenty-five, who are what the ETs refer to as ‘the last dark cabal’. The Statement of Principles and the actions of the U.S. government since 1997 certainly do have an unmistakeable tone of dark intent:
June 3, 1997:
“American foreign and defense policy is adrift. Conservatives have criticized the incoherent policies of the Clinton Administration. They have also resisted isolationist impulses from within their own ranks. But conservatives have not confidently advanced a strategic vision of America’s role in the world. They have not set forth guiding principles for American foreign policy. They have allowed differences over tactics to obscure potential agreement on strategic objectives. And they have not fought for a defense budget that would maintain American security and advance American interests in the new century.
We aim to change this. We aim to make the case and rally support for American global leadership.
As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world’s pre-eminent power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievements of past decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests?
We are in danger of squandering the opportunity and failing the challenge. We are living off the capital — both the military investments and the foreign policy achievements — built up by past administrations. Cuts in foreign affairs and defense spending, inattention to the tools of statecraft, and inconstant leadership are making it increasingly difficult to sustain American influence around the world. And the promise of short-term commercial benefits threatens to override strategic considerations. As a consequence, we are jeopardizing the nation’s ability to meet present threats and to deal with potentially greater challenges that lie ahead.
We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration’s success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’ global responsibilities.
Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership.
Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw their consequences for today. Here are four consequences:
• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global
responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;
• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;
• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;
• we need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.
Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.”
Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama
Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby
Norman Podhoretz Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz
From the above one might gain the impression that the west, and America in particular, feels it is morally justified in ruling the world by its own standards. One does not have to look very far for compelling evidence to the contrary – that it certainly is not justified in thinking so.
The ETs feel they cannot make widespread first contact with us until the Bush government has gone, because they say it isn’t safe for them. They believe they will be attacked by the military forces of the west. The Spiritual Hierarchy appears to agree.
According to messages recently published on the internet from several higher-dimensional sources, the Bush government, or at least those very few people in positions of real power, is still very dangerous and could deploy technologies of a kind powerful enough to destroy the planet. The ETs say they will not allow this to happen, and they keep an ever-watchful eye on what is being discussed or planned or executed.
The Americans have, reportedly, had extra-terrestrial technology for decades, and have an arsenal of extraordinary weapons at their disposal. It seems the development of many high technologies on Earth over the last few decades has owed much to extra-terrestrial sources. And indeed the ETs reputedly gave us such ideas as the internet which has proved such a boon in teaching us what we never hear through the mainstream media.
However, the ETs have higher technologies still, and can neutralise anything the Americans try to use. ET technology can penetrate any private room or facility above or below ground, and they routinely monitor discussions and happenings wherever there are goings-on that could affect the divine plan which they are helping to unfold.
What the ETs cannot control so easily is our own part in this plan. They are not allowed to intervene directly in our affairs, and it is for us to play our part, as it is our learning experience and our karmic responsibility. We must, as far as is possible, take it upon ourselves to deal with the situation of U.S. government misdemeanour; and U.K. government misdemeanour too.
The ETs have been given, however, a dispensation from a very high level of the Spiritual Hierarchy to intervene if the Bush government does anything which seriously jeopardises how the plan is to work out, and in any case the ‘divine right time’ is fast approaching when First Contact must be made, regardless. By all accounts this is to take place during 2006, and sooner rather than later.
(December 10th 2006: Nope, not yet.)
Asian Bird Flu pandemic and others:
On the one hand, flu pandemics seem to be a natural phenomenon, caused by the proximity of humans to birds or some other source; and on the other there is a good deal of credibility given to the idea that viruses and bacteria have been deliberately developed to reduce the human population. The AIDS virus is one of these.
Many leaders have been heard to talk about the need for population control, including King George VI and Henry Kissinger who talked about ‘the useless eaters’.
It seems there have been instances of viruses being developed to target selected populations, such as the AIDS virus which has hit the poorest populations worldwide. Clearly, a virus capable of being spread through sexual activity will hit the least sophisticated. Rumour has it that it was tested on America’s west coast gay population as a control group. And there has always been that inconsistency between claiming that the virus spread from monkeys in Africa and yet the AIDS pandemic hit America first.
The ETs say that the bird flu virus is man-made, and they can prevent it from mutating into a virus capable of easy human-to-human transmission. I don’t know how, but they seem to have this in hand, although the impact of AIDS on Africa and now India is devastating. So a bird flu pandemic will not occur. Nor will any other plague having a potentially global spread.
According to Carl Calleman, the western monetary system has its foundations in the cycles of the Mayan Calendar and the prevailing left-brain thinking led to the development of money as an abstract, standardised medium of exchange which is actually essentially worthless. Bankers describe our money as ‘fiat’ money. ‘Fiat’ means ‘let it be’, let it be agreed that this is money. The £10 note we have in our wallet is worth £10 because we agree that it is. In actuality, it’s only worth the paper it is printed upon – a few pence.
The cycles of the Mayan Calendar accurately trace the historic development of our monetary system. So what can be predicted for the near future? Since 1999 we have been living in a new cycle, one which favours the eastern hemisphere of the planet, and the right brain hemisphere which favours a more concrete approach. It is astonishing to discover that the new Euro currency was launched on 4th January 1999, and the new, 13-year cycle, which Calleman has dubbed ‘the Galactic cycle’, started on 5th January 1999.
Comparisons with the historical record tracked by Calleman strongly suggest that the launching of the new currency on that date is highly significant in terms of what may be expected to develop in this current cycle. Calleman proposes that the Euro will play a mediating role between the conflicts that have merged between East and West in this cycle.
Indeed, it is conjectured that the main reason why the U.S. government instigated a war against Saddam Hussein was that Saddam had begun to trade Iraq’s oil in the new Euro currency, thus beginning to displace the U.S. dollar as the world currency for oil. Today, in early 2006, the U.S. government is threatening to attack Iran on the pretext of its nuclear development programme, but Iran is planning to launch a new oil ‘bourse’ or market in which it will trade oil internationally using the Euro.
Whilst the Euro has not yet become the strongest and most stable currency, and it is the ultimate fiat currency being based on nothing whatsoever except the confidence of its users, it is showing signs of becoming the currency which will displace the power of the U.S. dollar.
At the same time, the U.S. dollar is in deep trouble, with the U.S. economy on the precipice, if not over already over the edge, into bankruptcy. In February 2006 the Federal Reserve announced that it had once again hit the “debt ceiling,” a figure based on federal law that limits the amount of money the federal government can borrow. The total amount of federal debt as of that month was a staggering $8.2 trillion, a number that is almost incomprehensible. The effects of this debt, however, will be felt in the form of inflation, higher interest rates, and a weakened U.S. economy. Those countries (mainly China) who presently keep America afloat by holding U.S. Treasury Notes, will most likely no longer continue doing so. Do you think China will continue to support a country’s economy (the U.S.) whose military launches a nuclear strike against its friend and neighbour (Iran) – thus delivering a blanket of radioactive fallout over western Chinese provinces – killing hundreds of thousands, if not millions of its citizens? I think not.
A collapse of the U.S. dollar would affect all of us. The U.S. has driven the global economy for many years, and a deep recession there would reduce economic activity everywhere. Referring back to the guile and wile of the international bankers, be aware that they and the war profiteers care little for people’s lives and families – those demons worship money and power – they have very much to gain from war, misery, disease, famine, chaos and death.
The U.K. economy is being dragged along by the self-same forces and it is inevitable that we too will slide rapidly into recession in the next few years. Total personal debt in the U.K. breached the £1 trillion barrier in July 2004 and is still rising. Interestingly, the total amount of ‘money’ in circulation in the U.K. is said to be £1 trillion. So it’s the least financially able who are shouldering the nation’s money stock. The ordinary people in the U.K. cannot sustain levels of debt on average of £50,000 per person and the rate of personal bankruptcy is rising fast, even before a recession has begun.
So what will this mean…..
I want to add in some more aggravating factors and provide a sense of the scale of the changes and challenges that lie ahead and which will bring, I believe, a profound change in the way we live:
The rising role of women:
Again with reference to the Mayan Calendar, it is to be expected that women, especially Eastern women, will assert themselves in a way which is long overdue and should be surprising in its tardiness were it not for the compulsion of the energies described by the Mayan Calendar.
I predict that at some time during the next 18 months, a woman, or group of women, from the East, probably Moslem women, will go to the United Nations in New York and say: “We come in peace. On behalf of all the mothers and sisters and daughters of women throughout the world, we call for peace in the world; a cessation of war and conflict, and an end to the divisions between East and West, between Christianity and Islam. We call for love and compassion to prevail.”
There is no voice stronger than a mother’s voice in defence of her children. The sound of the mother’s voice has long been needed, and the time has now come. (Note at 4th June 06, I have found the ‘Women say No to War’ website)
In the U.S., we have been hearing the voice of Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a young soldier who lost his life in Iraq, pleading for answers from George Bush: “What did Casey die for? What did the 2244 other brave young Americans die for? What are tens of thousands of them over there in harm’s way for still?” and the world is hearing her. The voice of the mother is being heard. It has the potential to change a great deal, to remedy the worst of man’s inhumanity to man.
This will also affect the global economy, which is rooted in the drive for wealth and power that is man’s desire, fostered and encouraged by men behind the scenes and by the lust for wealth and power that lies yet further behind those behind the scenes.
Extra-terrestrial economic management:
When the ETs make first contact, they will put into place a programme for the ascension of humanity and also for the Earth. This will be an exceedingly complex operation which will require our cooperation. I think we will comply readily enough because the ETs will explain so much to us that we will submit to their greater knowledge and also to their benevolence. It may be that the first thing they ask of us will be to stop using our cars.
The ETs are extremely conscious that we have been using the Earth’s blood – oil. They describe that dark gold substance as the lubricating fluid which allows the planet to move its joints and its plates and its land surfaces, and as such is as vital as our blood is to ourselves. They have, it seems, the technology to put the oil we have extracted from the Earth back into her, and they consider it a priority. The question is, to what extent will the ETs permit us to continue with our present way of life, so dependent on oil?
Not only will the ETs ask us to stop using our cars but also our lorries, even those that deliver food. Is this conceivable? Well, how long would they tolerate us continuing to use the fossil fuels? They say they have technologies to help us create food from light, using ‘replicators’ like those in the Star Trek movies. How long would it take for them to supply every household with a replicator? Would that even happen, in view of the extensive programme they have in mind?
I think the ETs would expect us to do what we should have done some years ago. We should grow food in a self-sufficient way in our own neighbourhood, so that we do not use oil to transport it. The same would apply to our clothing materials, breeding sheep for wool, and growing flax and hemp and cotton for the fibrous materials. Does this therefore mean reverting back to an agrarian economy more akin to Anglo-Saxon England? Possibly, yes.
During the transition to ascension or whatever our choices will bring, we will probably need to live a subsistence kind of lifestyle, where survival becomes an issue, and eliminating harm to the environment, to animals and to each other. We should be doing this already. We have known this for long enough but done little about it. We have reached the point where we need to be told: Stop! Now!
If we have not done so already, the ETs will tell us. I don’t think we can get away with it any longer.
Voluntary checking out:
I’m using the words ‘checking out’ to describe what would normally be called ‘dying’, because I believe that no-one dies. We are eternal, spiritual beings who pass from one state into another, and when we ‘die’ we go to Heaven. We stay in Heaven, or Nirvana as it is more properly named, I understand, until we go to another incarnation according to our guidance and choice.
At the present time we have to make a choice between three alternatives: ascending, moving to another planet, or checking out.
Ascending means taking on responsibility for the planet. It is not an easy choice, and not an appealing choice for people who prefer the kind of lifestyle many of us have today in which we do not feel particularly responsible for anything outside our immediate sphere of existence. I don’t think such people would describe ascension as the winning choice.
For all of us, though, it seems that we have an inbuilt urge to rise in consciousness and eventually merge back again into the ultimate source of our existence, the Creator. However this is not a race. Indeed, the Creator desires that all that can be learned should be learned, not only by ourselves but by Him (no gender intended). So we will not be thought as ‘losers’ if we do not ascend. It is our freewill choice to make this choice clear, if it is possible. I’ll go into that in more detail soon. But, for example, today, if you could choose to remain here or go to Heaven, which would you choose? For some people, the trials and tribulations of life here on Earth are enjoyable enough, and perhaps in some ways preferable to a heavenly paradise.
However if we choose to stay in the 3rd dimension we will not be able to stay here on Earth, because Mother Earth is ascending into the 4th or 5th dimension. My understanding is that the vibrational frequency of life here on Earth will not sustain 3rd dimensional life. If so, we will need to find a 3rd dimensional planet to which we can move.
The ETs have this already planned. There are numerous planets in the galaxy existing at the 3rd dimension. Many of these are unoccupied. The ETs can offer a choice between moving to an unoccupied world where we can start completely afresh, like the pioneers who moved to the New World of North America in the 1600s, or moving to a world where the ETs have already created cities with all the housing and advanced technologies to provide us with a superior lifestyle. The ETs have enormous spaceships with hyper-dimensional drive capable of transporting vast numbers of people at speeds which enable interplanetary travel to take mere hours or even minutes.
Such a choice might seem akin to winning the National Lottery, whereby one can start a whole new life free from the need to earn a living, free from rules imposed by others, free from Governments, religions and the other institutions, free to create a life that seems like an endless holiday offering opportunities for adventure and travel to amazing new places seeing landscapes and wildlife which no-one has seen before. It would be an amazing choice to make.
And on the other hand, one might choose to check out and go to Heaven. This too would be a good choice to make, because Heaven will be a familiar place; it’s designed that way so that the transition is as easy and reassuring as possible. We see our dear departed relatives and friends, and we enjoy a rest between incarnations. It’s a very desirable choice to take. Many people, perhaps especially the older people who do not feel they have the stamina to start a whole new life on a whole new world, would choose this alternative.
So everyone will have a choice between three alternatives, each of which will provide an amazingly wonderful outcome for everyone.
During the transitionary period, however, the last of these choices, the choice to check out, will provide some logistical problems for those left here on Earth. With lots of people dying, if I can revert back to that word now that I’ve taken the negative connotations out of it, there won’t be enough people to sustain our present way of life.
I understand that if we choose to die, we will be able to go peacefully in our sleep. We need only ask for this. We do not have to die in a natural disaster or accident, or through sickness or disease, or in any painful way. We can die easily and peacefully in good health and spirit, at more or less the time of our choosing. We can make preparations to die, make peace with our friends and relatives, and live the last few days of our lives knowing that they are the last, and we can embrace death in a way that hitherto would have been feared and unwelcome. This, however, is a very special time, when we are being granted our wishes. We have played our parts in a great cosmic drama, and we have played them perfectly. Now, having reached the end of it, we are being rewarded, handsomely. If we wish to go to Heaven, we will be helped to do so in our own time and in our own way.
And we don’t have to concern ourselves with those we leave behind. They are making their own choices too.
Those who are left behind will have to cope with a changing playing field, like, for example, not having people to grow food for them, or generate energy, or manage water supplies.
But those of us who are left behind can cope with that, can’t we? Of course we can. We just need to start making it happen NOW.
How will we cope?
There’s a saying that ‘the market’ can be relied upon to deliver. Commercial opportunity will fill every conceivable niche of demand. If one source of supply fails, another will come to take its place. And our experience has shown that this does in fact occur.
However I don’t think the market will cope with the scale of change that I’ve outlined above. I don’t think it will be possible to match supply with demand. Between climate change, the rising price of fuel, the dwindling labour force and an ever-deepening recession, perhaps even economic collapse, I think it will become more difficult to supply food and fuel in the way we’re accustomed to. I think we’d be too complacent if we thought we could carry on as before.
I think it’s necessary for us to know that we can supply our food from local sources, both from food stocks and from local agriculture, factory hydroponics and domestic gardens. Fuel will become more expensive and less available, and demand will not be met by new fuel technologies. I think we need to live on far less fuel.
We will need to guard our water supplies. The water which supplies our cities may continue to be plentiful, but we need to safeguard both the purity of the supply and the availability of the supply. Ideally we would have more local sources such as streams and wells.
Many people, even those from higher dimensional sources, have warned that we should be prepared for the worst. That is, prepare for a time when our entire infrastructure is collapsing and we have no supplies of food and fuel and water, not even those basic subsistence supplies.
This is surely a good, basic rule of living for those who live far away from the distribution centres, such as in the countryside. In the towns and cities, though, one would expect the infrastructure to be strong enough, flexible and adaptable enough, to withstand quite severe stresses. However the other side of that coin is the larger population that makes the infrastructure possible. That larger population needs vast supplies of food, fuel and water, and it takes next to nothing to spark a bout of panic buying sufficient to clear stocks from shop shelves before everyone has adequate supplies.
The answer to food supplies is to ensure that we have two years’ worth of tinned and dry foods under lock and key for the eventuality of a breakdown in supply. This should be a joint responsibility of individuals and the whole community. Whilst individuals and families should buy as much tinned and dry foods as they can store, neighbourhood communities should buy or build a warehouse or a unit in which community supplies can be stored securely. Local businesses and local authorities should set up storage facilities, not only for food but other supplies too, so that any danger of shortages can be minimised. When the time comes, food can be distributed on a fair basis. To avoid spoilage, food can be sold when the store is full, and replenishments can be purchased.
Local farms should grow food mainly for the local area, with any excess being sold to other regions or countries. Farming would include grains, potatoes and vegetables, and cows for milk and milk products, and poultry for eggs. We should stop eating meat.
Local businesses should set up hydroponic food-growing factories so that salad foods, fruit and vegetables can be grown year-round under secure conditions.
Domestic gardens should be planted with fruit trees and shrubs, and vegetables and salad foods and herbs. This is not the time to use domestic gardens for leisure or flower beds. Decking should be torn up and the ground used for food production. Decking wood can be used for fuel, later.
If we were to stop using oil today, we would have to find an alternative propulsion fuel. There are numerous forms of bio-fuel made from grains and vegetables which can fuel today’s cars with little modification. However, we will not have enough land to grow the quantity of fuel required for the internal combustion engine. The land will be required for food production.
In the early days of motor car development, the steam car seemed to be a viable choice, and was only eclipsed by petrol and diesel (both originally made from vegetable or nut oils) because of the relative convenience of starting a car using electric ignition, as was invented in due course, and by political pressure from the fossil oil suppliers. The first official Land Speed Record in 1898, and the next five records that followed, were held by electric vehicles. It wasn’t until 1902 that the silent speedsters lost their domination … to a steam car. Now today, efforts are being made to restore the steam car in the public’s imagination through new attempts at the Land Speed Record for steam-powered vehicles. Steam engines use water as the main working fluid, with the steam driving the pistons, as in a steam train. The fuel to heat the water could be a vegetable oil, and the efficiency could be double that of an oil-fuelled engine. The fuel could be grown cheaply locally, as opposed to the more expensive oil being acquired from politically or geologically difficult areas.
Therefore, given sufficient notice, a community could acquire steam-driven vehicles and grow and distil its fuel to transport both people and produce.
It is also possible to drive the internal combustion engine on water alone, using the electricity contained in the car battery to split the water into combustible hydrogen and clean oxygen molecules. Instructions can be found on the internet. Another water-based system is called the Joe Cell, and shows much promise.
Otherwise, transport would be reduced to horse-drawn carriages and wagons, or manpower such as bicycles. Today there are insufficient horses, especially the stronger Shire horses, to provide horsepower.
Anyway, we have, in effect, come to the end of our oil-driven civilisation regardless of ascension and pressure from ETs. The demand for oil is already outstripping supply without the cost rising to uneconomic levels, and the supply is forecast to come to an end either very soon or fairly soon depending on optimistic or pessimistic forecasts. So we need to prepare for a different way of life, and the time to do that is today, NOW. It might be worth adding up how many times I’ve already used the word ‘now’ in capital letters. I predict that the last line of this script will say it ten times over.
Fuel for heating and lighting and machinery etc. would need to be from an altogether new source. If fossil oil is to be prohibited, if coal is too dirty, if burning wood is considered too harmful to trees, if there is insufficient land to grow fuel crops (biomass), if nuclear fuel is too dangerous and too difficult to dispose of, if hydroelectric power is already used to its limit, if wind power is too limited, if solar power is only part of the answer, then we have to find new technology.
On the internet there is talk of Zero Point energy technology, and ‘free energy’ technology. Magnetic devices seem to offer some hope. I have been hosting a website www.magneticenergy.org.uk since 2005. This contains channelled material with full instructions from what appear to be divine or extraterrestrial sources about magnetic devices which can “help to save the planet.” Cold fusion appears to be a reality although it has not reached a viable stage. In the time we have available, none of these technologies seems to provide an answer. More importantly, the oil barons are preventing the commercial development of these technologies. Funding is not available in sufficient quantity to make research and development feasible.
So, while we are waiting for the ETs to supply technologies based on light which offer the potential to power anything and everything, we will find ourselves short of fuel. How will we cope?
I believe we have a model for a society in which there is no mass-produced fuel, in the Anglo-Saxon society that prevailed in England prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066. Manpower supplied much of the energy, with some basic machinery using simple physics such as the wheel, levers, gravity and suchlike. Wood and dried crops, animal dung and peat provided fuel for fire. If our present-day society collapsed suddenly, the Anglo-Saxon model is the default model to which we would return. Once we had exhausted the supply of combustible matter in the cities, we would return to the country.
But is this a realistic scenario for the near future? I think it is.
The only alternative I can offer is that the ETs might support a gradual process of weaning-off fossil fuel and as rapid a transition to light technologies as possible. In the interests of maintaining a relatively orderly transition, this would seem to be necessary.
I think this is a possibility, since the ETs are aware of our predicament. They know that we are limited in our ability to make the changes that we know are needed. They must also know that it would not be helpful if our societies were to turn to chaos. However, if they were to agree to a gradual transition, it would be no more gradual than was absolutely necessary. We would have to accept some restrictions, some rationing, some discipline.
This, of course, depends on first contact from the ETs. If they’re just a figment of my imagination, we’re on our way back to an Anglo-Saxon society. At least we know it worked, in its day. The main difference would be the much higher population. Possibly, the population may be falling as the infrastructure breaks down, in chicken-and-egg fashion. It is to be hoped so, otherwise……..
Then again, there is ‘The Rapture’, in which ‘the chosen ones’ will be taken off-Earth by spaceship before the real disintegration begins. Or so it’s said….by some sources…it doesn’t seem very credible, does it? Time will tell.
Law and Order
If the infrastructure of our society breaks down because of any of the numerous threats I have outlined above, there could be serious law and order problems, with looting and rioting in the streets. Therefore it is essential that we become prepared for such.
This means planning for whatever may possibly come. At the moment we have the police force, and it has volunteer officers to cover some level of contingencies. I would recommend that the police multiplies the number of volunteer personnel they can call upon. These people need to be trained for civil emergencies of all kinds, and they need to be trained NOW.
If there is a possibility of an economic collapse, as I believe there is, this will impact the value of our money. Remember hyper-inflation in Germany when a barrow-full of notes was needed to buy a loaf of bread? Maybe that was an exaggeration. But also remember what I said about money being worth what we agree it to be worth. Our agreements can change, and when confidence is lost in the stability of our money, its value changes – it falls.
This is one of the negatives about our monetary system. It is vulnerable to the confidence factor because it is ‘fiat’ money, it’s just token money, not having any real value.
Compare this to barter, where, according to folklore, a sheep would be given a value and could be exchanged for things which add up to the same value – say, two piglets for example. The item itself has a definite value according either to a commonly agreed value or simply by ad hoc agreement between the parties involved in the exchange. There’s no need to find actual money to make the exchange, and where the value of money falls, no need to find more money to make the exchange.
In anticipation of our present monetary system becoming unstable, or even collapsing altogether, I feel it’s necessary to adopt more ‘real’ exchange systems. These could include barter, or lending, or sharing, or even just gifting. Ideally, to my mind, we should do without money altogether, and simply give to each other according to our needs.
When so-called civilisation falls into chaos, what we are left with is a common desire to survive reasonably comfortably, and it becomes a community effort. Ideally we would all contribute our resources to the community, including our organising ability and our manual labour. Priority would be given to creating food and fuel supplies, clothing and shelter. Anything else could be agreed upon. If any trade is required between communities, this could be done by bartering, lending, sharing or gifting in the same, mutually supportive way. This may seem idealistic but when the need arises, hopefully the best of human nature would win through.
Wouldn’t it be so much better to live without money? Money gives other people the ability to control our societies, as we are now discovering to have been true for centuries. Money fosters inequality, greed and selfishness, and is indeed the root of all evil. If we find we have to do without money, let’s celebrate.
Or, as a temporary measure, we could create local currencies which would take us through a transitionary period towards a money-less economy. These could also be fiat currencies, adopted on an agreement basis. It would mean that towns and cities could issue currency to all their citizens to enable transactions to take place. This has the added advantage of money being retained within the local area, ‘within the family’, rather than being lost to ‘outsiders’. When survival becomes an issue, we all need to pull together. We all have an instinctive understanding that it’s better to keep one’s resources circulating within one’s own ‘economy’, rather than exporting the money.
The ETs and the Spiritual Hierarchy are insisting that a new monetary system NESARA (National Economic Security and Reformation Act) will be launched worldwide very soon, that it has already been agreed by national governments, the currency notes have been printed and all systems are in place and waiting only for the American government to fall before it is launched. The new system will be backed by gold, silver and other precious metals.
I’m not entirely sure about the NESARA system. Since precious metals are prone to fluctuating in value, and finite in supply, the value of the currency must also fluctuate. So precious metals are not a guarantee of stability. And who owns the precious metals? The banks which issue the currency? How do they buy the precious metals, and from whom?
I understand the idea is that enlightened people will take control of the banks to ensure there is no repeat of the present abuse of the monetary system. If so, I would have thought that a fiat system would have worked just as well, if not better. A fiat system is not inherently bad – it’s as good as the people who are managing the economy.
(December 10th 2006: However, according to a source, Celestial Blue Star, quoted in the ‘Message from Matthew’ on December 5th 2006: “As I have stated before, “NESARA is the “Golden Age,” NESARA is here and NOW. All that you have longed for is available to you. Do not mistake the true NESARA with the deliberately designed lies about untold monetary wealth. It will be those people who follow the trail of the “great lie” that shall not be part of the Golden Age. NESARA the GOLDEN AGE was never intended to be a monetary event. It is about Infinity on Earth and each person’s earned place in this wondrous new “time.” It is being God in physical form.”)
A recent press release from the United Nations said that for the first time in almost 27 years, the United Nations General Assembly is debating the issue of establishing diplomatic relations with advanced extra-terrestrial civilisations that may now be visiting Earth.
On December 16, 2005, a resolution to establish a United Nations Decade of Contact was formally transmitted to the incoming President of the General Assembly, H.E. Jan Eliasson of Sweden by the Institute for Co-operation in Space (ICIS), a Non-Governmental Organization.
President Eliasson was Sweden’s Ambassador to the United Nations from 2000 to 2005.
Perhaps this makes it more likely that the ETs will choose to co-ordinate first contact through the United Nations rather than individual national governments. On the other hand, that might usurp the power of national governments in an unacceptable way.
However it is done, first contact will profoundly change the government of nations. The ETs are coming to assist in the ascension of Mother Earth and of humanity. They are not coming to take over the governments of the world. However, they will not allow national governments to interfere with the processes the ETs are carrying forward. Perhaps there will be power struggles, but it seems unlikely in view of the ETs’ non-interference directives, despite their superior knowledge and capabilities – and benevolence. ETs need to be invited to assist, not to take over.
What it will do, however, it to paralyse governments. They will find themselves unable to carry through whatever programmes they have in place. Why? Because the ETs will be telling them what needs to be done in anticipation of the quantum leap that lies ahead. Even if the ETs urge business-as-usual in order to avert chaos in government, it is probable that chaos will prevail.
This is why contingency planning at this stage is vital. Plans to maintain at least a subsistence way of living for all the people must be put in place NOW.
Local government therefore has a crucial role to play. It is local governments which will need to organise the planning for the transitionary phases. Supplies of food, fuel and water need to be planned for NOW. Security for all the people needs to be planned for NOW. An exchange system, whether it be NESARA or a new local currency needs to be planned for NOW.
People living in towns and cities need to speak to their local councillors and to civic officials to alert them to this need, before it is too late. The people involved in local government are best placed to organise things on behalf of the whole local area. Otherwise when the time comes, anarchy will reign. This must be avoided by contingency planning NOW.
This should also involve the area’s planning authorities which may need to override national guidelines in order to build or convert facilities for food supplies. It should involve the police, the farmers’ unions, the power companies and all those currently involved in managing the society’s infrastructure. And planning should be done in terms of the worst-case scenario.
Will the worst-case scenario actually happen?
The goal-posts keep moving. There was a time, two decades ago, when it was predicted that earthquakes and volcanic eruptions would devastate so much of the planet that the human race would scarcely survive. Whilst there have been serious earthquakes, and more frequent and intense earthquakes than previously, they have not yet threatened the entire planet.
Since the ETs and the Spiritual Hierarchy have become actively involved in the process, and claim to have transmuted some of the energies that would otherwise have caused catastrophic earthquakes, it increasingly seems that we will not suffer as expected.
There was a time when it was thought, even by the Spiritual Hierarchy, it seems, that few humans would ascend, and the rest would perish in increasingly severe plagues of one sort and another. Now we hear from the ETs that they are disabling the viruses and bacteria that could cause disease pandemics, and whether these are man-made or of natural origin they no longer pose a threat. And the Spiritual Hierarchy is talking about the possibility of mass ascension.
It could almost seem that the next few years may pass without any outward sign that we are going through this ascension process, and that we will ascend en masse without even realising it. Could that possibly be? Will the ETs go home without making first contact?
If so, how would we know that there ever was an end-of-days process and a quantum leap into a higher dimension?
I think we will indeed know that something spectacular is happening, and I think we’ll know before much longer.
What I hope is that the ETs make first contact before we go into a state of fear about what is happening in the world. Preferably that should be before George Bush and the dark cabal declare war on Iran, possibly as early as June 2006, just over a month from the time of writing this.
(December 10th 2006: As I said earlier….it ain’t happened yet.)
Next chapter: First Contact
List of chapters
New Living Home Page